Attributed metadata history
Up to 100 retained publisher events per page for a1263ebe56e7a26a079c156fa29f5e335ade388cf8312af82f74c952e1f048ab. Withdrawals and unavailable references remain attributed to their publishers.
intelligence_src_1face9fbd38e6da52e
observed · 2026-10-12 07:24:02 UTC
Here's a riddle: Why did a Goshen Police Department officer search 6,474 automated license plate reader (ALPR) networks, representing data from 82,413 cameras, on May 7, 2025? If your answer is "I don't know," it turns out you're 100% correct. The officer left the letters "idk" in the search field where cops are supposed to document the reason for the search. When law enforcement and tech salespeople pitch ALPRs to city councils, they stick to a familiar script. They trumpet the technology, which is often provided by private companies like Flock Safety, Motorola Solutions, or Axon, as an essential tool for solving high-stakes crimes, such as car jacking, kidnapping, or murder. But when you strip away the carefully curated talking points, the data continues to reveal a different (and frankly, ridiculous) story. An EFF analysis of ALPR search logs from Flock Safety systems shows that officers across the country are spying on drivers for completely nonsensical "reasons." Police are routinely searching the Flock database without providing any legitimate justification, making a mockery of our civil liberties by logging reasons like "LOL" (short for “laugh out loud”), "LMAO" (short
Fingerprint: fe8bf684c3c4f0b61d67030003f420556cc7248fd33de972963ab6c97af58a81
intelligence_src_1face9fbd38e6da52e
observed · 2026-10-12 07:24:02 UTC
available
Fingerprint: 26390ad0fe5801d724db095b6f3e20dab68aab0d98bec680d558061152062b0a