Attributed metadata history
Up to 100 retained publisher events per page for de1512271758425d3b8481dfac6eb59580dd94bdea59ddc51a48711d0b7b96e3. Withdrawals and unavailable references remain attributed to their publishers.
intelligence_src_1face9fbd38e6da52e
observed · 2026-10-12 07:24:02 UTC
available
Fingerprint: 26390ad0fe5801d724db095b6f3e20dab68aab0d98bec680d558061152062b0a
intelligence_src_1face9fbd38e6da52e
observed · 2026-10-12 07:24:02 UTC
A California law that prohibits teens from receiving recommended social media content from other social media users violates their First Amendment rights, EFF argued this week. The case, Meta v. Bonta, challenges SB 976, which requires that teen social media users get their parents’ permission before seeing other users’ recommended speech on their social media feeds. The legal challenge to SB 976 has largely centered on how the law violates social media services’ First Amendment rights to curate user-generated content and present it as they see fit. But the friend-of-the-court brief EFF filed along with the Center for Democracy & Technology and the Wikimedia Foundation shows that the law violates teen users’ First Amendment rights, too. “SB 976 frustrates young people’s ability to use the internet to its full potential, prohibiting them from relying on tools that disseminate their speech and help them view and interact with other users’ speech,” the brief argues. Recommendation systems have a dual purpose on social media: they help all users discover speech and content by other users, and to get their own speech in front of a wider audience. “SB 976 creates si
Fingerprint: c048e112aaf8032187d158ffb9f1e6cf07a8297d3da4a91148793fcf7251a57c