Attributed metadata history
Up to 100 retained publisher events per page for f7f441b2346226e567598e026a0df45103ed6790874135c61fec5f2f05539494. Withdrawals and unavailable references remain attributed to their publishers.
intelligence_src_1face9fbd38e6da52e
observed · 2026-10-12 07:24:02 UTC
The term “digital sovereignty” has become ubiquitous. European officials invoke it in debates about cloud infrastructure, AI, semiconductors, and platform regulation. Governments throughout the global majority use it to argue for greater control over data and communications infrastructure and boost their economies. Companies market “sovereign cloud” products designed to reassure their customers that their information stays under local jurisdiction. But digital sovereignty could be something more: an opportunity for users around the world to build more resilient, open systems and the skills and infrastructure to maintain them. There is no singular definition of digital sovereignty, nor is there a single coherent position in the digital rights space. Despite its growing popularity, the term remains frustratingly vague. Policymakers, regulators, civil society groups, and others can mean very different things when they use the term. But to start simply with a broad definition, we can say that it means having the capacity to control one’s digital destiny—though the implications of that will obviously differ considerably whether you’re talking about an individual or a cou
Fingerprint: b541e6eac706d02a4698e0987747ed37ed36e13fe568e8cd2bdf732dd0e38ca4
intelligence_src_1face9fbd38e6da52e
observed · 2026-10-12 07:24:02 UTC
available
Fingerprint: 26390ad0fe5801d724db095b6f3e20dab68aab0d98bec680d558061152062b0a