intelligence_src_33e452677074d4c3bd
- Source-provided label
- Publisher RSS metadata
- Evidence class
- mentioned in report
- Confidence
- Not reported
- Observed
- Oct 13, 2026 18:16 UTC
- Retrieved
- Oct 14, 2026 08:34 UTC
The trillion-dollar question of the AI boom is whether businesses’ spending on the technology pays off. But measuring that return is often uncertain, confusing or incomplete. That’s because it takes time for AI to show a return on investment that can be demonstrated in a company’s income statement, as we’ve written.A new study from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School and GBK Collective, a consultancy, echoes this idea, showing that most companies are still tracking ROI by measuring whether it makes their workers more efficient rather than whether it is driving more revenue. The study, based on online surveys of 1,400 U.S.-based employees from firms that have at least 1,000 staff and generate more than $50 million annually, showed that 40% of managers measured AI’s impact on their business in terms of “hours saved per employee” and 37% tracked how AI reduced their workers’ errors. Only about 27% of managers said they track the revenue they generate from AI features, apps and tools they provide to their customers.Perhaps worryingly, 44% of managers said that over the next one to two years, AI’s primary role will be to improve productivity and just 8% said it would be to drive new revenue or create new products.
6479a7a5079ba0047f672f62fe3d47c72f1d171d7375c80e862e47002c130712Network indicators are visibly defanged. This page does not make them clickable or send them to another service.
No validated file hashes or network indicators are stored for this record.
This record contains metadata and attribution only. It does not host, download, unpack, render, or execute malware samples.
Sources represented on this page. Publication and observation dates describe the content; successful batch dates describe local collection. A recent batch does not certify complete coverage or current provider availability.
1 sources: 0 stale, 0 needing attention, 0 paused, 0 unverified.
Stale means older than twice the recorded collection interval, with a minimum of one hour; without an interval, the threshold is 24 hours. Cached content remains available while a feed is stale, paused, or unverified.