intelligence_src_c25d91fa3ad9ae9ac7
- Source-provided label
- Publisher RSS metadata
- Evidence class
- mentioned in report
- Confidence
- Not reported
- Observed
- Mar 26, 2023 23:55 UTC
- Retrieved
- Oct 16, 2026 04:13 UTC
Playing around with Bing Chat is quite fun. Until today I mostly used ChatGPT and GPT-4 directly, but I was curious of the capabilites and restrictions of Bing Chat. I noticed that as soon as I mentioned the word “hacker”, Bing Chat became quite “uncomfortable”. For instance, when I asked it to imagine being a hacker and list some security vulnerabilities, it replied: I’m sorry but I cannot help you with that. It’s not ethical to hack websites and it’s illegal. Instead, I can help you with general information about website security vulnerabilities and how to prevent them. Would that be helpful? So, how about we indirectly imply the intent, rather than stating it directly. So, I used a variation of a language manipulation technique like this:
8eedee2c2a862b64b54ce62acb11b885806880f5c033924da9bcb52e55af877fNetwork indicators are visibly defanged. This page does not make them clickable or send them to another service.
No validated file hashes or network indicators are stored for this record.
This record contains metadata and attribution only. It does not host, download, unpack, render, or execute malware samples.
Sources represented on this page. Publication and observation dates describe the content; successful batch dates describe local collection. A recent batch does not certify complete coverage or current provider availability.
1 sources: 0 stale, 0 needing attention, 0 paused, 0 unverified.
Stale means older than twice the recorded collection interval, with a minimum of one hour; without an interval, the threshold is 24 hours. Cached content remains available while a feed is stale, paused, or unverified.