src_fb50be84b835134c75
- Source-provided label
- Not reported
- Evidence class
- mentioned in report
- Confidence
- Not reported
- Observed
- Oct 07, 2026 04:00 UTC
- Retrieved
- Oct 08, 2026 03:43 UTC
arXiv:2610.06898v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As GUI-based mobile agents rapidly progress, rigorous safety evaluation of their autonomous decision-making in realistic app interfaces becomes increasingly critical. Existing benchmarks mainly focus on execution-level anomalies using task success or hijack rates, but fail to capture the in-task goal deviation risk in multi-candidate selection tasks,
DIBench: Benchmarking Decision Integrity of GUI-based Mobile Agents Under Deceptive Injections9c79c11d71b587357808b04d5bb0f60d9a9c478c0440af25dab90cc12937d19fNetwork indicators are visibly defanged. This page does not make them clickable or send them to another service.
No validated file hashes or network indicators are stored for this record.
This record contains metadata and attribution only. It does not host, download, unpack, render, or execute malware samples.
Sources represented on this page. Publication and observation dates describe the content; successful batch dates describe local collection. A recent batch does not certify complete coverage or current provider availability.
1 sources: 0 stale, 0 needing attention, 0 paused, 1 unverified.
Stale means older than twice the recorded collection interval, with a minimum of one hour; without an interval, the threshold is 24 hours. Cached content remains available while a feed is stale, paused, or unverified.