src_fb50be84b835134c75
- Source-provided label
- Not reported
- Evidence class
- mentioned in report
- Confidence
- Not reported
- Observed
- Oct 07, 2026 04:00 UTC
- Retrieved
- Oct 08, 2026 03:43 UTC
arXiv:2610.08406v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) scanners achieve high recall but also produce a large number of false positives, resulting in substantial manual triage costs. Large Language Models (LLMs), when used for independent detection, achieve extremely high recall (95.4%-100%) but also exhibit prohibitively high false positive rates (49.6%-85.0%),
Case-Level Verification in Scanner-LLM Cascades: Overcoming the Alert Aggregation Bottleneck to Expand the FRR-TPR Trade-off Spaceac322993f98ced66c8ee492b7ec56bd36e2ed6d3c0165574d41c38813c8696b2Network indicators are visibly defanged. This page does not make them clickable or send them to another service.
No validated file hashes or network indicators are stored for this record.
This record contains metadata and attribution only. It does not host, download, unpack, render, or execute malware samples.
Sources represented on this page. Publication and observation dates describe the content; successful batch dates describe local collection. A recent batch does not certify complete coverage or current provider availability.
1 sources: 0 stale, 0 needing attention, 0 paused, 1 unverified.
Stale means older than twice the recorded collection interval, with a minimum of one hour; without an interval, the threshold is 24 hours. Cached content remains available while a feed is stale, paused, or unverified.