src_fb50be84b835134c75
- Source-provided label
- Not reported
- Evidence class
- mentioned in report
- Confidence
- Not reported
- Observed
- Oct 07, 2026 04:00 UTC
- Retrieved
- Oct 08, 2026 03:43 UTC
arXiv:2610.08240v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used to generate code. Although their functional plausibility keeps improving, the generated code often contains security vulnerabilities. The functionality-security gap captures code that passes functional tests but fails security tests. A recent longitudinal study of three model families concluded that LLMs
Newer and Bigger, but Safer? A Longitudinal Study of the Functionality-Security Gap in LLM-Generated Codebd758123331ac58c9f29e627e50248d312702f22c239cfaf3a1cd0d5a7f84e75Network indicators are visibly defanged. This page does not make them clickable or send them to another service.
No validated file hashes or network indicators are stored for this record.
This record contains metadata and attribution only. It does not host, download, unpack, render, or execute malware samples.
Sources represented on this page. Publication and observation dates describe the content; successful batch dates describe local collection. A recent batch does not certify complete coverage or current provider availability.
1 sources: 0 stale, 0 needing attention, 0 paused, 1 unverified.
Stale means older than twice the recorded collection interval, with a minimum of one hour; without an interval, the threshold is 24 hours. Cached content remains available while a feed is stale, paused, or unverified.