CVE-2026-104850.

Disclosure summary

### Summary In affected versions, the SDK's OAuth client let the MCP server decide which authorization server received the client's OAuth credentials. Credentials were not tied to the authorization server they belong to. A malicious or compromised MCP server could name its own authorization server. With no user interaction, the client would send it: - the `refresh_token` and `client_secret` stored from an earlier sign-in - the `client_secret` or signed assertion configured on a bundled provider ### Am I affected? Yes, if both of these hold: - your application uses the SDK's OAuth client over HTTP, through any of: - an `authProvider` on a transport - the `withOAuth()` middleware - direct calls to `auth()` or `fetchToken()` - it may connect to an MCP server you do not fully trust while holding credentials for a legitimate authorization server Affected versions: - `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk` 1.12.0 through 1.30.1 - `@modelcontextprotocol/client` 2.0.0 through 2.1.0, only for: - bundled providers without `expectedIssuer` - credentials stored or supplied without `issuer` - direct calls to `fetchToken()` - providers that read storage back through `OAuthTokensSchema` or `OAuthClientInform

Source-specific records & product guidance

Sources retain their own attribution and scoring. Follow the original record to confirm affected versions, fixed releases, and configuration conditions.

Original records & references

• NIST NVD record
• CVE Program record
• github.com — Reviewed advisory

PUBLISHED 2026-10-06T11:35:44-04:00
MODIFIED 2026-10-06T11:35:44-04:00
INGESTED 2026-10-06T11:45:43-04:00